Weightloss Forum

» Advertisers



» Stats
Members: 25,760
Threads: 29,871
Posts: 581,732
Top Poster: maleficent (20,077)
Welcome to our newest member, sharjawi8
View Single Post
  ratio of time dieting vs. building Post #9 (permalink)  
Old May 11th, 2007, 12:37 PM
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Deos Fortioribus Adesse
Posts: 16,985
Rep Power: 181
Steve has disabled reputation
Send a message via Yahoo to Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by corndogggy View Post
I was specifically talking about Steve's example. He said he hit 205, then he was like whooops, time to back pedal and diet because you can't hardly see the abs. So basically I was wondering if in that situation if it's acceptable if he could have stopped at 200 pounds then dieted for a shorter period of time before building again. I didn't know if doing this vs. longer term building and dieting if it would produce the same results.

Basically I'm asking all this because I really don't want to pack much fat on at all since I just busted my ass all winter losing it all. I think I'd rather have smaller size gains before I got too much fat back on but I don't know where exactly the magic number is, I don't know what the minimum amount of time or whatever could be and still actually have gains.
Simply start eating 10-15% above maintenance. It is stupid to try and lock in on a "magic" number for you. Again, it is all touch and feel. Simply create a small caloric surplus and work with that. Track measurements. Simple as that.
Reply With Quote
 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

| fitness.com | Fitness Training | Babyforum.com | |