Weightloss Forum

» Advertisers



» Stats
Members: 25,763
Threads: 29,871
Posts: 581,737
Top Poster: maleficent (20,077)
Welcome to our newest member, amandacutest
View Single Post
  I need some references Post #9 (permalink)  
Old February 21st, 2008, 03:15 PM
[Focus]'s Avatar
[Focus] [Focus] is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 697
Rep Power: 12
[Focus] has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by LandonsBaby View Post
Well, I was told nicely to shut up and stop posting my calorie "theory".
Hahaha. That's brutal. There's a reason I don't bother arguing with people on the internet. Nobody actually wants to learn anything, they just want to spout their poorly-conceived rhetoric. Both sides think they are objectively correct. Problem is, there is no objective "right".

Having said that, low (under 50g/day) carb diets are effective for a number of purposes. Some people are just as narrow minded in decrying their efficacy as your ignorant friends are at touting it, but the fact remains that calories in vs. calories out is still usually the primary consideration in fat loss.

This does not mean, however, that those women are not seeing results. There's a documented (mostly anecdotal, but meh) auto-regulation of the appetite effect that occurs for many people on a ketogenic diet. (It has to do with the relative absence of insulin and some "dependent" "hunger hormones"). So it is entirely possible that they can eat "as much as they want (because this ends up being less than their maintenance)" and lose fat. Are they seeing optimal results, though? Of course not. Intellectual arrogance has always been the enemy of knowledge.
Reply With Quote
 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

| fitness.com | Fitness Training | Babyforum.com | |