Weightloss Forum

» Advertisers



» Stats
Members: 25,728
Threads: 29,849
Posts: 581,569
Top Poster: maleficent (20,077)
Welcome to our newest member, lianemiller
View Single Post
  So....maintaining... Post #3 (permalink)  
Old May 29th, 2008, 09:28 AM
Darth Pooh's Avatar
Darth Pooh Darth Pooh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,064
Rep Power: 17
Darth Pooh has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Maintenance for me was a matter of testing out caloric intakes mixed with a static amount of exercise. This happens to be 16 calories per pound given a 3-5 day exercise week.

As long as you're in the general ballpark, weight should maintain, assuming you're not always on the high side, lol.

Where people screw up is when they figure, "hey, I'm at my goal, so I can be a little more lax." Said laxness turns into more and more cheats and more and more skipped workouts and sooner than later, what seems to be small deviations lead to large caloric surpluses... so much so that weight is regained.

And then you have people screaming about the stats that 97% of diets fail.

No, they work.

People just revert back to their original programming more often than not.
God damn man... maintenance is 3000 calories for you? That's insane! I can't imagine what you have to take in for a BULK!

And Mindi... I suggest upping calories by about 10% and seeing how it does for you every two weeks in terms of measurements. If you are losing... bump up 10% more. If you are maintaining, go with it. IF you are gaining... obviously too much. But I'd start getting more calories in. Likewise you could also turn down the exercise, but why? It's great for your health...
Reply With Quote
 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

| fitness.com | Fitness Training | Babyforum.com | |