» Site Navigation | | | » Tag Cloud | | Search Tags | » Stats |
Members: 36,397
Threads: 16,797
Posts: 175,226
Top Poster: maleficent (21,583) | | Welcome to our newest member, pixeldust | | | Welcome to Weight Loss Forum - This information will disappear after Registration.
| | |
Welcome to the Weight Loss Forum forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Note: After registering, you will receive an activation email. This will contain a link required to fully activate your account and allow you to post. Some email providers may put this in your JUNK or SPAM folder.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|  | | 
September 30th, 2008, 06:02 PM
|  | Female Body Sculptor | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Deos Fortioribus Adesse
Posts: 15,116
Rep Power: 657592 | | | First, refeeding is a specific way of eating with a specific goal.
What I'm talking about in this thread is simply eating sane. People go around eating far too few calories and I'm talking about reversing that. In my world, that's not refeeding. But that's not important to this discussion either.
I've actually seen people lose weight while ramping up their calories.
On the flipside, I've seen people gain too.
But never ridiculous amounts, assuming intelligent tactics are used.
If someone is dieting using a huge deficit and they're realizing success. it's hard to get them to 'see the light.' If someone is dieting using a huge deficit and they're plateaued, it's easy to 'get them to see the light.'
Whatever the case may be, it's simply a matter of ramping up the calories steadily while tracking the metrics and tweaking exercise. There's no clear cut way of going about it. It's a tough & feel process based on individual response. | 
October 13th, 2008, 01:24 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 0 | | | Thanks for printing the formula. It works for me, except for the exercise factor. At my age/weight/sex (59/215/F) my BMR calculation comes out to 1613, or 1913 at "sedentary" (about right). But when I try to add in the exercise factor, I come out with way too high a calorie count.
I exercise 5 or 6 days per week, typically an hour of ice skating or biking. I would characterize that as "moderate exercise." But the calculation for "moderate" adds a calorie burn of almost 900 per day! There's no way that can be right. According to the calorie estimators I've checked, an hour of biking or skating at my weight should burn 600-700 calories (which seems to match my experience).
Am I misunderstanding the levels of exercise implied by the descriptions? | 
October 14th, 2008, 05:32 AM
|  | Female Body Sculptor | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Deos Fortioribus Adesse
Posts: 15,116
Rep Power: 657592 | | | It's not just exercise.
It's all activity. | 
October 20th, 2008, 09:23 AM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by shygemini I guess i don't really understand why people find it is necessary to go to such low calories to lose weight. I"m eating 2300 calories/day and losing 2lbs a week. It isn't difficult, i took off 250calories from maintenance and then i'm exercising 4 or so days a week, and i'm not hungry. | *sigh* Must be nice. You have a high metabolism, and that's wonderful. Not everybody does. You may find that your metabolism slows down A LOT when you hit middle age. Mine sure did.
I'm still not sure how you could be losing 2 pounds a week by cutting out 250 calories a day and exercising. You'd have to be burning an additional 750 calories per day, 7 days a week, for that to work. That's some exercise program! Or maybe you have actually cut back your calories more than you realize. | 
November 29th, 2008, 07:30 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0 | | | Eating too much is a habit Eating too much can quite simply be a habit, and it does take some "starvation" to cut it back to healthy proportions.
Food is essential though to good health.
Great post! I enjoyed reading it!
__________________ [size="3"][color="Navy"]If you get a chance, I'd love for you to SPAMIDY SPAM SPAM | 
November 30th, 2008, 12:32 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 5404 | | | I've read monkeys on a starvation diet live longer.
__________________  Never give up. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | Starvation mode | skyler | Advanced Weight Loss | 213 | October 21st, 2008 12:02 PM | | How many calories is enough....? | lymelyte | Weight Loss Through Exercise | 2 | December 24th, 2006 08:58 AM | |