karacooks, all of that makes perfect sense. Which is why I expected to see a difference between my blood pressure at 230
pounds (more or less steady state), compared to my bp when I weighed 262. I didn't.
I was also disappointed to see no drop in my blood pressure when I gradually increased my weekly aerobic exercise to about double what it had been. I clearly increased my cardiac
fitness level by every other measure, but my blood pressure stayed pretty much the same.
However, I do see my blood pressure drop when I am IN THE PROCESS of losing weight. When I stabilize at a lower weight the improvement doesnt seem to be retained. At least not so far.
I am currently following a moderate
diet/exercise program that has me losing about 4
pounds/month and my average bp is 124/62 (21 readings over 2 months). Before I started on the
diet it was 137/80. I'd love to believe it would stay where it is if I stabilized my weight at this level, but I'll bet it would bounce right back up to the higher level.
I can think of a couple of possibilities why this might happen (e.g., reducing diets tend to be lower-carb, so less water retention). I just wonder if other people see this.
I also wonder if the way that studies are done leads to a confusion between the effects of being on a
diet and the effects of weight itself. That might be the reason that the results are always stated as a relationship between
weight LOSS and blood pressure, rather than as a relationship between WEIGHT and blood pressure. The key piece of information would be a follow-up a few months after the study to see if blood pressure went back up again once weight stabilized. I wonder how many studies actually do that follow up?