Weightloss Forum

Go Back   Weight Loss Forum > Nutrition and Recipes > Nutrition

Nutrition Often poor nutrition is at the root of accumulating unnecessary pounds. Many people reach their target weight without starving or depriving themselves — just through changes in their diet. Meet with people who have successfully lost weight through he



» Current Poll
How do i look in the AFTER picture
VERY FAT - 8.33%
7 Votes
FAT - 8.33%
7 Votes
MEDIUM BUILD or PERFECT - 77.38%
65 Votes
SLIM - 5.95%
5 Votes
Total Votes: 84
You may not vote on this poll.
» Stats
Members: 35,983
Threads: 16,627
Posts: 173,730
Top Poster: maleficent (21,588)
Welcome to our newest member, PurpleandSaint
Welcome to Weight Loss Forum - This information will disappear after Registration.
Welcome to the Weight Loss Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Note: After registering, you will receive an activation email. This will contain a link required to fully activate your account and allow you to post. Some email providers may put this in your JUNK or SPAM folder. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 8th, 2006, 11:07 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 0
SarahPT is an unknown quantity at this point
New research on aspartame

I thought some people might find this interesting...

"Humans are not rats!"

Artificial sweetener cleared of cancer link
Major study finds people who drink lots of diet sodas don't face higher risk

The Associated Press
Updated: 6:23 p.m. ET April 4, 2006


WASHINGTON - A huge federal study in people — not rats — takes the fizz out of arguments that the diet soda sweetener aspartame might raise the risk of cancer.

No increased risk was seen even among people who gulped down many artificially sweetened drinks a day, said researchers who studied the diets of more than half a million older Americans.

A consumer group praised the study, done by reputable researchers independent of any funding or ties to industry groups.

"It goes a fair way toward allaying concerns about aspartame," said Michael Jacobson, head of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which had urged the government to review the sweetener's safety after a troubling rat study last year.

Findings were reported Tuesday at a meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.

Aspartame came on the market 25 years ago and is found in thousands of products — sodas, chewing gum, dairy products and even many medicines. NutraSweet and Equal are popular brands.

Research in the 1970s linked a different sweetener, saccharin, to bladder cancer in lab rats. Although the mechanism by which this occurred does not apply to people and no human risk was ever documented, worries about sugar substitutes in general have persisted.

They worsened after Italian researchers last year reported results of the largest animal study ever done on aspartame, involving 1,800 lab rats. Females developed more lymphomas and leukemias on aspartame than those not fed the sweetener.

Large government study
The new study, by scientists at the National Cancer Institute, involved 340,045 men and 226,945 women, ages 50 to 69, participating in a research project by the National Institutes of Health and AARP, formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons.

From surveys they filled out in 1995 and 1996 detailing food and beverage consumption, researchers calculated how much aspartame they consumed, especially from sodas or from adding the sweetener to coffee or tea.

Over the next five years, 2,106 developed blood-related cancers such as lymphoma or leukemia, and 376 developed brain tumors. No link was found to aspartame consumption for these cancers in general or for specific types, said Unhee Lim, who reported the study's findings.

Results 'very reassuring'
The dietary information was collected before the cancers developed, removing the possibility of "memory bias" — faulty recollection influenced by knowing you have a disease.

"It's very reassuring. It's a large study with a lot of power," said Richard Adamson, a senior science consultant to the American Beverage Association, the leading industry group.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest still warns about one potential hazard of aspartame use: thinking that calories "saved" from using a sugar substitute justify "spending" more on unhealthy foods.

"Drinking a diet soda at lunch does not mean it's okay to have a larger dessert at dinner," the group's Web site warns.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sarah
__________________
Train with me for support, motivation, and SUCCESS! http://www.sarahpersonaltraining.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aspartame,the good,the bad & the ugly smiley Nutrition 9 September 26th, 2006 03:08 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS

| fitness.com | Fitness Training | Babyforum.com | | diet pills |