Weightloss Forum

Go Back   Weight Loss Forum > General > On Topic

Notices

On Topic

"Related Items" or "this & that" :D Health Related "stuff" that just doesn't seem to fit into any other category.


» Site Navigation
 > Shop
» Chat
» Shop
» Advertisers
» Stats
Members: 27,132
Threads: 30,568
Posts: 587,755
Top Poster: maleficent (20,075)
Welcome to our newest member, hakrami
» Fitness Shop
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  It's all about the calories right? Post #1 (permalink)  
Old August 16th, 2009, 07:30 AM
Ben Coomber's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hull, UK
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 2
Ben Coomber is on a distinguished road
It's all about the calories right?

There is a lot of talk about calories all over the forum and i wanted to share my favorite article regarding the truth about calories from a well respected doctor in america who consults for polequin performance in the US. A good read for everyone!

Hey, it’s all about the calories, right? Not!

By Jonny Bowden, MA, CN, CNS

December 14, 2006

Dr. Jonny examines the myths and pitfalls of calorie counting. Read on for the straight dope on better eating.

Gather round, folks, because I’m going to tell you a story.

Once upon a time, around 1890 actually, a scientist named Wilbur Atwater got the bright idea of putting food into a special machine, burning it and measuring the amount of heat it produced. The machine was called a calorimeter. Old Wilbur decided to call the energy produced by burning the food into ash “calories”. Thus, he was able to figure how many calories were contained in just about any food you could imagine.

Shortly afterwards, scientists applied the same concept to exercise. Using a few calculations, they soon figured out how many calories were “burned” doing everything from sleeping to cross-country skiing.

Within no time, an idea was born: weight gain happened when a person took in more calories than he burned up. The body, it was reasoned, behaves like a calorimeter. Put in calories (from food.) Use up calories (from living, exercising, digesting, etc) and look at your balance sheet. If more is coming in than going out, you gain weight. If more goes out than came in, you lose. Simple. Especially if the body behaved like a calorimeter.

But it doesn’t.

The people who sell empty, useless, nutritionally dead calories (sugar anyone?) love the calorie theory. According to them, sugar is perfectly acceptable since weight loss is only a matter of eating less calories. Just don’t eat so many darn calories and you won’t get fat. If you do, says the sugar industry, don’t blame us. Sugar doesn’t cause weight gain, as long as you don’t eat more calories than you “burn”.

‘Of course that ignores all the other things that sugar does beside providing (empty) calories. Sugar raises blood sugar, depresses the immune system, robs the body of calcium and uses up mineral stores. But that’s another story.

The Body as a Laboratory
Then there’s one other itty bitty problem: the body doesn’t behave like a calorimeter. It behaves like a chemistry lab.

Here’s an example: eat a bar that’s 100 calories of sugar. Your blood sugar jumps up. The pancreas responds with a big shot of insulin, whose job it is to bring blood sugar down. In some people it doesn’t do such a great job, leaving them with high blood sugar and high insulin, both risk factors for heart disease. In others it does the job fine, but the sugar winds up in the fat cells. Either way, you lose. And we’re not talking about losing fat!

On the other hand, let’s say you eat a bar that’s 100 calories of protein, fat and fiber. The protein provides nutrients necessary for the building of the body’s architecture- bones, muscles, enzymes, neurotransmitters. It also makes you feel full so you’re less likely to overeat. The fiber slows the entrance of sugar into the bloodstream and also helps protect against cancer. The fat provides important building blocks for cell membranes and hormones. Protein has only a mild effect on blood sugar and insulin, and neither fiber nor fat have any effect at all. While both bars are equal from a caloric point of view, they are anything but equal from the point of view of hormones, fat storage and health.

The effect of different sources of calories on blood sugar and hormones like insulin is one of the most important concepts in nutrition, and one which dieticians still haven’t figured out.

The bottom line: eat foods that have the least impact on blood sugar - fiber, for example, and fat, along with green leafy vegetables, low sugar fruit and plenty of protein, all of which provide nutrients, building blocks and health benefits. Sugar, on the other hand, provides none of those. It will instead keep you on the blood sugar roller coaster that inevitably leads to health problems such as obesity.

If you’re looking only at calories, you’re missing the fine print. Take two typical “low carb” bars. While both have about 200 calories, Bar One has only 1 measly gram of fiber, 14 grams of protein, and 20 grams of sugar alcohols. Bar Two, on the other hand, has a whopping 10 grams of fiber, 19 grams of protein and a mere 4 grams of sugar alcohols, a sweetener which usually does not have a significant impact on blood sugar or insulin.

That’s the fine print that’s missing if you only pay attention to calories. Calories do matter, but they’re very far from the whole story.

Remember, God is in the details or, in this case, in the fine print.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Weight Loss Forum > General > On Topic

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar threads to It's all about the calories right?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calories from fat vs. glycogen calories question
Calories from fat vs. glycogen calories question: So I talked to a personal trainer and afterwords...
Beatlesboy On Topic 15 July 19th, 2009 09:11 AM
Good Calories, Bad Calories
Good Calories, Bad Calories: I searched for this book here but didn't find it....
Mindy60 Weight loss in the media 10 November 26th, 2007 12:18 PM
Calories - good calories vs bad calories?
Calories - good calories vs bad calories?: I've recently started to use the strategy of...
almostthere Nutrition 15 September 21st, 2007 05:01 AM
Calories
Calories: Im doing a basic lowish calorie diet. I have...
sabrina_20 Weight Loss Programs 25 August 6th, 2007 01:59 PM
How many calories do i need?
How many calories do i need?: Hi, I was just wondering if someone could help...
leeuk87 Advanced Weight Loss 0 July 6th, 2007 04:22 AM

Other threads in forum On Topic
Thread Date Thread Starter Replies Last Post
A fitness and nutrition inquiry, all help appreciated.
A fitness and nutrition inquiry, all help appreciated.: Hello! I'm fifteen years old, 184/185cm tall...
August 14th, 2009 Leanfreak 5 August 17th, 2009 12:27 PM
Calories Burned Per Day
Calories Burned Per Day: I have a few questions. 1. How many...
August 14th, 2009 LG_ 4 August 14th, 2009 06:23 PM
MyPlate.com Question about 'allowed additional calories'
MyPlate.com Question about 'allowed additional calories': Hello all, I'm finding it a bit difficult to...
August 8th, 2009 blueberry 7 August 12th, 2009 04:46 AM
resistance training
resistance training: I've tried looking, and I've clicked around to...
July 28th, 2009 antyoch 2 July 28th, 2009 03:44 PM
Question about excess flab
Question about excess flab: I think this post goes in this forum, i hope so!...
May 15th, 2009 Romance 2 May 28th, 2009 04:14 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

| fitness.com | Fitness Training | Babyforum.com | |

You are viewing It's all about the calories right?.