
Anybody who's against the death penalty might not want to read this.....
First things first.....I didn't exactly know what that guy had done before, but after reading it, there were a few things that came to my mind....
So, it was apparently cruel to execute him because of his weight....well, I have an idea. How about bread, water and hard labour for 12 hours a day, instead of feeding him up over 20 years or something? That would have saved some taxpayers money as well!
They could also have forgotten about the injection, and have gone for the 'what goes around, comes around' approach - stick him in a room with some 500 lbs guys and let him get raped, stabbed and bludgeoned to death. Maybe with a nice X carved into his
fat belly, just for nostalgic reasons. And just to give him a taste of what 'cruel' really means.
As far as I am concerned, the guy got off lightly. And why in the world did they keep him around for 20+ years anyway? If they'd gotten rid off him 20 years ago, he wouldn't have had the chance to get
fat in the first place....just a thought.
Yepp, touchy subject. Very touchy indeed. And I admit, I might have an extreme view on this, but can you really read that article and think that there was an alternative to ridding the world of that animal, once and for all?